Linearised small-perturbation potential equation
The linearised small-perturbation potential equation (1 − M∞²)φxx + φyy + φzz = 0: derivation idea, validity limits, elliptic vs hyperbolic character, tangency condition and linear Cp.
Drafted with Aria, reviewed by the AiCanCode.org team. Spotted an error? Use Give Feedback at the bottom of the page.
Why it matters
The full equation for compressible potential flow is nonlinear and hard to solve. For thin wings and slender bodies at small angles, it reduces to one linear equation — the basis of the Prandtl–Glauert rule for subsonic flow, Ackeret theory for supersonic flow, and the panel and supersonic area-rule methods used in early design. Knowing where it comes from tells you exactly when those quick results can be trusted.
Key ideas
Starting point. For steady, inviscid, irrotational (isentropic) flow, the velocity is the gradient of a potential, V = ∇Φ. Combining continuity, Euler's equation and a² = (∂p/∂ρ)ₛ gives the full potential equation, in which the local speed of sound depends on the local velocity through the energy equation. It is nonlinear.
Small perturbations. Write the velocity as the free stream plus small disturbances: u = V∞ + u', v = v', w = w', with u'/V∞, v'/V∞, w'/V∞ ≪ 1, and define the perturbation potential φ with u' = ∂φ/∂x, v' = ∂φ/∂y, w' = ∂φ/∂z. Substituting and dropping products of small quantities gives the linearised small-perturbation equation
(1 − M∞²)·φxx + φyy + φzz = 0.
When the linearisation is valid.
- Thin or slender bodies at small angle of attack, so the disturbances really are small.
- M∞ not close to 1. Near M∞ = 1 the coefficient
(1 − M∞²)becomes small and the dropped termM∞²(γ+1)(u'/V∞)φxxis comparable to it — the transonic regime needs a nonlinear equation. - M∞ not too large (hypersonic): the product
M∞·τ(τ = thickness ratio or angle) must stay small; otherwise the perturbations are not small relative to the speed of sound. - No strong shocks (they create entropy and vorticity); weak shocks are acceptable because the entropy jump is third order.
Character of the equation.
- M∞ < 1:
(1 − M∞²) > 0, the equation is elliptic, like Laplace's equation in stretched coordinates. A disturbance is felt everywhere; the Prandtl–Glauert transformationx' = x,y' = β·y(withβ = √(1 − M∞²)) maps it onto incompressible flow. - M∞ > 1:
(1 − M∞²) < 0, the equation is a hyperbolic wave equation. In 2-D its general solution isφ = f(x − λy) + g(x + λy), withλ = √(M∞² − 1). Disturbances travel only along Mach lines at the Mach angleμ = sin⁻¹(1/M∞), and only downstream.
Boundary condition. Flow tangency at the body surface y = y_s(x) becomes, after linearisation, v'(x, 0) = V∞·dy_s/dx applied on the axis y = 0 rather than on the actual surface (for 2-D bodies).
Pressure coefficient. Expanding the exact isentropic Cp and keeping first-order terms gives Cp = −2u'/V∞ for 2-D flow. For slender bodies of revolution the cross-flow term must be kept: Cp = −2u'/V∞ − (v'² + w'²)/V∞².
Formulas
(1 − M∞²)·φxx + φyy + φzz = 0 — linearised perturbation potential equation.
u' = ∂φ/∂x, v' = ∂φ/∂y, w' = ∂φ/∂z — perturbation velocities (m/s).
Cp = −2u'/V∞ — linearised pressure coefficient (2-D, thin bodies).
v'(x, 0) = V∞·(dy_s/dx) — linearised tangency condition.
β = √(1 − M∞²) (subsonic), λ = √(M∞² − 1) (supersonic).
Supersonic 2-D surface pressure (simple wave): Cp = ±2θ/√(M∞² − 1), where θ is the local surface slope relative to the free stream (+ for compression).
Symbols: φ perturbation potential (m²/s); M∞, V∞ free-stream Mach number and speed (m/s); u', v', w' perturbation velocity components (m/s); x along the stream (m); y_s(x) body surface shape (m); θ surface slope (rad); Cp pressure coefficient (dimensionless).
Worked examples
Example 1 (standard). In a stream at M∞ = 0.6, V∞ = 200 m/s, the axial perturbation velocity at a point on a thin airfoil is u' = 12 m/s. Find the linearised Cp and the coefficient of φxx. Compare with the exact isentropic Cp. γ = 1.4.
Cp = −2u'/V∞ = −2 × 12/200 = −0.120.- Coefficient
1 − M∞² = 1 − 0.36 = 0.64(positive, so elliptic). - Exact isentropic:
Cp = (2/(γM∞²))·[(1 + (γ−1)/2·M∞²·(1 − V²/V∞²))^(γ/(γ−1)) − 1]withV = 212 m/s:1 − 1.1236 = −0.1236;1 + 0.072 × (−0.1236) = 0.99110;0.99110^3.5 = 0.96921;Cp = (2/0.504) × (−0.03079) = −0.1222.
Answer: Cp ≈ −0.120 (linear) vs −0.122 (exact); the 2% difference is the neglected second-order terms.
Example 2 (GATE level). A thin 2-D surface in a M∞ = 2 stream has a local slope of 0.05 rad into the flow. Using linearised theory find the perturbation velocities and Cp. Take V∞ = 600 m/s.
λ = √(4 − 1) = 1.732.- Tangency:
v' = V∞ × 0.05 = 30 m/s. - For the upper surface,
φ = f(x − λy), sou' = f'andv' = −λf':u' = −v'/λ = −30/1.732 = −17.3 m/s. Cp = −2u'/V∞ = 2 × 17.3/600 = +0.0577. Check:2θ/λ = 2 × 0.05/1.732 = 0.0577.
Answer: u' ≈ −17.3 m/s, v' = 30 m/s, Cp ≈ +0.058 (compression on a surface inclined into the flow).
Common mistakes
- Writing Laplace's equation
∇²φ = 0for compressible flow; the(1 − M∞²)factor is the whole point. - Using
Cp = −2u'without dividing byV∞— Cp must be dimensionless. - Applying linear theory at M∞ ≈ 1 or for blunt bodies.
- Applying the tangency condition on the true surface instead of on
y = 0. - Dropping the
(v'² + w'²)term for slender bodies of revolution. - Forgetting that the supersonic equation is hyperbolic: there is no upstream influence.
For GATE AE
Expect: identifying the type of the equation for subsonic or supersonic flow, the coefficient 1 − M∞², the linearised Cp formula, the tangency condition, conditions of validity (thin body, M not near 1, not hypersonic), and short calculations linking slope, perturbation velocity and Cp. It underpins Prandtl–Glauert and Ackeret questions, so be fluent with β and λ.
Quick check
- What type of PDE is the linearised equation at M∞ = 2?
- Write the linearised 2-D pressure coefficient.
- Why does the linear theory fail near M∞ = 1?
- On which line is the linearised tangency condition applied?
- What is
1 − M∞²at M∞ = 0.8?
Answers: 1. hyperbolic; 2. Cp = −2u'/V∞; 3. the coefficient of φxx tends to zero and the neglected nonlinear term dominates; 4. on the axis y = 0; 5. 0.36.
Interview questions
All Compressible Aerodynamics interview questionsTry answering each one aloud before you open it.
1.What is the linearised small-perturbation potential equation in compressible aerodynamics?Concept
It is (1 − M∞²)φxx + φyy + φzz = 0, where φ is the perturbation potential whose derivatives give the small velocity disturbances u', v', w' added to the free stream. It comes from the full nonlinear potential equation by assuming the disturbances are small compared with V∞ and dropping products of small terms. It is elliptic for subsonic and hyperbolic for supersonic free streams, and it is the basis of the Prandtl–Glauert rule and Ackeret's supersonic thin-airfoil theory.
2.Explain the assumptions made in deriving the linearised small-perturbation potential equation.Concept
The flow is steady, inviscid and irrotational (isentropic), so a velocity potential exists, and the gas is perfect. The body is thin or slender at a small angle so that u'/V∞, v'/V∞, w'/V∞ ≪ 1, and products of perturbations are dropped. The free-stream Mach number must not be close to 1 (transonic), where the neglected nonlinear term becomes comparable to (1 − M∞²)φxx, nor hypersonic, where M∞ times the thickness ratio is no longer small. Shocks, if present, must be weak.
3.Why is the linearised small-perturbation potential equation important in aerospace engineering?Application
The linearised small-perturbation potential equation is important because it provides a way to analyze and predict the behavior of compressible flows around aircraft and other aerospace vehicles. It simplifies the complex equations of motion, making it easier to study the effects of small changes in flow conditions, which is crucial for designing efficient and stable aircraft.
4.What are the limitations of using the linearised small-perturbation potential equation?Application
The main limitations are that it is only valid for small perturbations and cannot accurately predict flow behavior in regions with strong shocks or large separations. It also assumes irrotational and inviscid flow, which may not be applicable in real-world scenarios where viscosity and rotational effects are significant.
5.How does the Mach number affect the applicability of the linearised small-perturbation potential equation?Application
The Mach number affects the applicability because the equation assumes that the flow is not transonic. At transonic speeds (Mach number close to 1), the flow experiences significant changes that violate the small perturbation assumption. Therefore, the equation is most applicable at subsonic or supersonic speeds where the Mach number is not near 1.
6.What happens if the assumptions of the linearised small-perturbation potential equation are violated?Application
If the assumptions are violated, the predictions made by the equation may become inaccurate. For example, if the perturbations are not small, the linearization is invalid, leading to errors in predicting pressure and velocity fields. Similarly, if the flow is not irrotational or inviscid, the results may not reflect the true aerodynamic behavior.
7.In what scenarios would you choose not to use the linearised small-perturbation potential equation?Application
You would choose not to use it in scenarios involving strong shock waves, large flow separations, or transonic speeds where the assumptions of small perturbations and linearity do not hold. Additionally, if viscous effects are significant, such as in boundary layer analysis, this equation would not be suitable.
8.What is the linearised pressure coefficient in small-perturbation theory, and what is Cp at a point where u' = 6 m/s in a 150 m/s free stream?Numerical
Expanding the exact isentropic pressure coefficient and keeping first-order terms gives Cp = −2u'/V∞ for two-dimensional thin bodies (slender bodies of revolution also need the −(v'² + w'²)/V∞² term). It contains no explicit Mach number; compressibility enters through the solution for u'. Here Cp = −2 × 6/150 = −0.08, a suction because the local flow is faster than the free stream.
9.Explain how the linearised small-perturbation potential equation is used in the design of supersonic aircraft.Application
In the design of supersonic aircraft, the linearised small-perturbation potential equation helps engineers predict how small changes in the aircraft's shape or flight conditions affect the flow field. This is crucial for optimizing aerodynamic performance, minimizing drag, and ensuring stability at high speeds. By understanding these perturbations, designers can make informed decisions about the aircraft's geometry and control surfaces.
Finished this topic? Mark it so your progress, study plan and readiness keep up.
Stuck on something here?