Sulphuric acid by the contact process
Contact process for sulphuric acid: sulphur burning, V2O5 converter with inter-bed cooling, absorption in 98% acid, oleum and DCDA, with converter material balances.
Drafted with Aria, reviewed by the AiCanCode.org team. Spotted an error? Use Give Feedback at the bottom of the page.
Why it matters
Sulphuric acid is the largest-volume chemical in the world and the backbone of phosphatic fertiliser production, so its output is often used as an index of a country's industrial activity. The contact process is a textbook case of a reversible, exothermic catalytic reaction where the engineer must trade equilibrium conversion against reaction rate, and of absorption with a strong heat effect.
Key ideas
Raw materials. Elemental sulphur (most common today, often recovered from refineries), pyrites (FeS₂), smelter off-gases from copper and zinc roasting, or spent acid.
Process steps (sulphur-burning plant).
- Melting and filtering sulphur, then burning it in dry air: S + O₂ → SO₂, strongly exothermic. The burner gas typically contains 8–12 % SO₂. A waste-heat boiler recovers the heat as high-pressure steam.
- Air drying: combustion air is dried in a packed tower irrigated with 93–98 % H₂SO₄. Moisture would form acid mist with SO₃ that is very hard to absorb and corrodes downstream equipment.
- Catalytic conversion: SO₂ + ½O₂ ⇌ SO₃, ΔH ≈ −99 kJ/mol. The catalyst is vanadium pentoxide (V₂O₅) promoted with potassium sulphate on a silica support; it is active between about 400 °C (ignition) and 600 °C (above which it deactivates). The converter has 3–4 adiabatic beds with cooling between beds. In each bed the temperature rises as conversion rises; inter-bed coolers bring the gas back near 420–440 °C so that the next bed can push conversion closer to the falling equilibrium line.
- Absorption: SO₃ is absorbed in 98–98.5 % H₂SO₄, not in water. Water would react with SO₃ in the gas phase to form a fine acid mist that passes through the tower. The acid strength is held constant by adding water to the circulating acid. Absorbing SO₃ in 98 % acid without adding enough water gives oleum (fuming sulphuric acid, H₂SO₄ with free SO₃).
- Double contact double absorption (DCDA): after 2–3 beds the gas goes to an intermediate absorber, which removes SO₃. Removing a product shifts the equilibrium, so the remaining SO₂ converts further in the last bed. Overall conversion reaches 99.7 % or more, compared with about 98 % for single absorption. This is what keeps stack SO₂ within emission limits.
Le Chatelier's view of the converter. The reaction is exothermic and decreases moles (1.5 → 1), so low temperature and high pressure favour equilibrium. In practice the plant runs near atmospheric pressure (excess air and DCDA give enough conversion without compressors) and at the lowest temperature at which the catalyst is still fast enough.
Why V₂O₅ and not platinum. Platinum was used in early plants but is expensive and easily poisoned by arsenic and other impurities. V₂O₅ is cheap and tolerant.
Comparison with the lead chamber process. The older chamber process used nitrogen oxides as homogeneous catalysts and gave only about 62–78 % acid. The contact process gives 98 % acid and oleum directly.
Energy. The plant is a net steam exporter: combustion, conversion and absorption are all exothermic.
Formulas
S + O₂ → SO₂, SO₂ + ½O₂ ⇌ SO₃, SO₃ + H₂O → H₂SO₄
Overall: S + 1.5O₂ + H₂O → H₂SO₄ (32.06 kg S gives 98.08 kg acid)
X = (n_SO₂,in − n_SO₂,out) / n_SO₂,in
- X: fractional conversion of SO₂ (dimensionless), n: molar flow (kmol/h).
Kp = p_SO₃ / (p_SO₂ · p_O₂^0.5) (units bar^−0.5); Kp falls as temperature rises because the reaction is exothermic.
Equivalent H₂SO₄ in oleum (%) = (100 − w) + w × 98.08 / 80.06
- w: mass % free SO₃ in the oleum. Gives the mass of 100 % acid obtained per 100 kg oleum after adding water. Example: 20 % oleum = 104.5 % H₂SO₄.
Molar masses: S 32.06, SO₂ 64.06, SO₃ 80.06, H₂SO₄ 98.08 g/mol.
Worked examples
Example 1 (standard): sulphur demand. A plant makes 100 t/day of H₂SO₄ (100 % basis). Overall sulphur-to-acid efficiency is 99.5 %. Find the sulphur required.
- 1 mol S gives 1 mol H₂SO₄, so the theoretical sulphur = 100 × 32.06 / 98.08 = 32.69 t/day.
- Actual = 32.69 / 0.995 = 32.85 t/day.
Answer: about 32.9 t/day of sulphur.
Example 2 (GATE level): converter balance and stack SO₂. Burner gas: 10 mol % SO₂, 11 % O₂, 79 % N₂. Conversion of SO₂ in the converter is 98 %, and all SO₃ is absorbed in a single absorber. Find the SO₂ content of the gas leaving the absorber, in ppm (by volume).
- Basis 100 mol of feed: SO₂ 10, O₂ 11, N₂ 79.
- SO₂ converted = 0.98 × 10 = 9.8 mol, giving 9.8 mol SO₃. O₂ used = 9.8 / 2 = 4.9 mol.
- Converter exit: SO₂ 0.2, O₂ 6.1, SO₃ 9.8, N₂ 79; total 95.1 mol.
- After the absorber removes all SO₃: 0.2 + 6.1 + 79 = 85.3 mol.
- SO₂ fraction = 0.2 / 85.3 = 2.345 × 10⁻³.
Answer: about 2340 ppm SO₂. This is far too high for modern limits; DCDA at 99.7 % conversion cuts it to about 350 ppm, which is why DCDA is standard.
Common mistakes
- Saying SO₃ is absorbed in water. It is absorbed in 98–98.5 % acid; water gives acid mist.
- Thinking higher temperature always helps. It speeds the reaction but lowers equilibrium conversion; above about 600 °C the catalyst also deactivates.
- Forgetting the volume change when computing mole fractions after conversion: total moles fall by half the SO₂ converted.
- Treating oleum percentage as acid strength. 20 % oleum means 20 mass % free SO₃, equivalent to 104.5 % H₂SO₄.
- Assuming the catalyst shifts equilibrium. It changes only the rate.
For GATE CH
Typical questions: catalyst identity and its promoter, the function of the drying tower and the absorber, why 98 % acid is the absorbent, why DCDA is used, and the effect of temperature and pressure on conversion. Numericals: sulphur or pyrite requirement, converter material balances with fractional conversion, mole fractions after reaction, oleum equivalents and simple Kp calculations. Practise balances on a 100 mol basis.
Quick check
- What is the catalyst and its usual promoter?
- Why is the gas cooled between converter beds?
- In which liquid is SO₃ absorbed?
- What does DCDA achieve?
Answers: 1. V₂O₅ promoted with K₂SO₄ on silica; 2. the reaction is exothermic, and cooling restores a higher equilibrium conversion for the next bed; 3. 98–98.5 % sulphuric acid; 4. intermediate SO₃ removal shifts equilibrium so overall conversion exceeds 99.7 %, cutting stack SO₂.
Interview questions
All Chemical Technology interview questionsTry answering each one aloud before you open it.
1.What is the contact process in the production of sulphuric acid?Concept
It is the standard route to sulphuric acid: sulphur (or pyrites) is burnt to SO2, the SO2 is oxidised to SO3 over a V2O5 catalyst in a multi-bed converter at about 420-600 °C, and the SO3 is absorbed in 98-98.5% H2SO4 (not water, which would form acid mist), with water added to hold the acid strength. Absorbing without enough water gives oleum. Modern plants use double contact double absorption to exceed 99.7% conversion.
2.Explain the role of the catalyst in the contact process.Concept
In the contact process, a catalyst such as vanadium(V) oxide (V₂O₅) is used to speed up the oxidation of sulfur dioxide (SO₂) to sulfur trioxide (SO₃). The catalyst provides an alternative reaction pathway with a lower activation energy, allowing the reaction to proceed more quickly and efficiently at the operating temperature of around 450-600°C.
3.Why is vanadium(V) oxide preferred over platinum as a catalyst in the contact process?Application
Vanadium(V) oxide is preferred over platinum as a catalyst in the contact process because it is less expensive and more resistant to poisoning by impurities such as arsenic. Additionally, V₂O₅ operates effectively at the high temperatures used in the process, whereas platinum can be deactivated by impurities.
4.What happens if the temperature in the contact process is too high?Application
SO2 + 1/2 O2 <-> SO3 is exothermic, so a higher temperature lowers the equilibrium conversion and more SO2 leaves unconverted to the stack. Above roughly 600 °C the V2O5 catalyst also sinters and loses activity. That is why the converter uses several adiabatic beds with cooling between them, keeping each bed inlet near 420-440 °C.
5.Describe the absorption tower used in the contact process.Concept
It is a packed tower, usually brick-lined steel with ceramic packing, in which the SO3-laden gas flows up against 98-98.5% sulphuric acid flowing down. SO3 is absorbed in this acid rather than in water because water vapour and SO3 form a fine acid mist that escapes absorption. Water is added to the circulating acid to keep its strength constant, the heat of absorption is removed in acid coolers, and candle mist eliminators at the top catch remaining mist.
6.What is the purpose of the drying tower in the contact process?Application
It removes moisture from the combustion air (or from the SO2 gas in metallurgical plants) by contact with 93-98% sulphuric acid in a packed tower. Dry gas is needed because water vapour would combine with SO3 to form acid mist, which is hard to absorb, corrodes ducts and heat exchangers, and leaves the stack as a visible plume.
7.Calculate the theoretical yield of sulfur trioxide if 100 kg of sulfur dioxide is used, assuming complete conversion.Numerical
The balanced chemical equation for the conversion of sulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide is 2 SO₂ + O₂ → 2 SO₃. The molar mass of SO₂ is approximately 64 g/mol, and the molar mass of SO₃ is approximately 80 g/mol.
- Moles of SO₂ = 100,000 g / 64 g/mol = 1562.5 mol
- Moles of SO₃ produced = 1562.5 mol (1:1 ratio)
- Mass of SO₃ = 1562.5 mol × 80 g/mol = 125,000 g or 125 kg.
8.What are the environmental concerns associated with the contact process?Application
The contact process can lead to the emission of sulfur dioxide (SO₂), which is a significant air pollutant and can contribute to acid rain. Proper scrubbing and emission control systems are necessary to minimize these emissions. Additionally, the handling and storage of sulfuric acid must be managed carefully to prevent leaks and spills, which can be hazardous to the environment.
9.Explain why the contact process is considered more efficient than the lead chamber process.Application
The contact process is considered more efficient than the lead chamber process because it produces a higher concentration of sulfuric acid, typically around 98%, compared to the 62-78% concentration from the lead chamber process. The contact process also allows for better control of reaction conditions and higher conversion rates of sulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide.
Finished this topic? Mark it so your progress, study plan and readiness keep up.
Stuck on something here?