Langmuir-Hinshelwood and Eley-Rideal mechanisms

Deriving Langmuir-Hinshelwood and Eley-Rideal rate laws from surface mechanisms, their limiting orders and rate maxima, and fitting them to data, with worked rate and parameter-estimation examples.

Drafted with Aria, reviewed by the AiCanCode.org team. Spotted an error? Use Give Feedback at the bottom of the page.

Why it matters

Power-law rate expressions often fail for catalytic reactions: the order changes with pressure, and adding more of one reactant can even slow the reaction. Langmuir–Hinshelwood (LH) and Eley–Rideal (ER) mechanisms explain this behaviour from surface coverage and give rate laws that can be fitted to data, extrapolated with confidence and used to size catalytic reactors.

Key ideas

Building a rate law from a mechanism (LHHW approach). Write the elementary steps — adsorption, surface reaction, desorption. Assume one step is rate-controlling and that all the others are at equilibrium. Express surface coverages by Langmuir isotherms, use a site balance (vacant + occupied = total), and substitute into the rate of the controlling step. The resulting forms are called Langmuir–Hinshelwood–Hougen–Watson (LHHW) rate laws.

Assumptions. Uniform surface (all sites equivalent), monolayer adsorption, no interaction between adsorbed species, adsorption equilibria described by Langmuir isotherms, and a single rate-controlling step.

Langmuir–Hinshelwood mechanism. Both reactants adsorb and react as adsorbed neighbours: A + S ⇌ A·S, B + S ⇌ B·S, A·S + B·S → C + 2S. With the surface reaction controlling, the rate is proportional to θA·θB, giving a squared denominator. Key behaviour: at fixed pB the rate rises with pA, passes through a maximum when A starts crowding B off the surface, then falls. The maximum occurs where KA·pA = 1 + KB·pB (+ product terms).

Eley–Rideal mechanism. Only A adsorbs; B reacts directly from the gas phase with adsorbed A: A·S + B(g) → C + S. The rate is proportional to θA·pB, so the denominator is not squared and the rate increases monotonically with pA, levelling off at saturation. A maximum in rate vs pA therefore points to LH rather than ER.

Single reactant on one site (A ⇌ A·S → R·S ⇌ R + S, surface reaction controlling): first order at low pA, zero order at high pA, inhibited by adsorbed product.

Dissociative adsorption (e.g. H₂ → 2H·S) gives √(KA·pA) terms.

Adsorption-controlled case. If adsorption of A is slowest, the rate depends on pA and the "equilibrium" pressure of A in balance with the surface; for A → R with A adsorption controlling, the denominator has no KA·pA term.

Choosing a model. Linearise each candidate and test against data — for example, single-site unimolecular: pA/r = 1/(k·KA) + pA/k. Use initial-rate data at different total pressures: the dependence of initial rate on total pressure distinguishes adsorption, surface-reaction and desorption control. Constants must be physically sensible (positive K values, adsorption constants falling with temperature since adsorption is exothermic).

Apparent activation energy. For the single-site case at low coverage, r ≈ k·KA·pA, so E_app = E_true + ΔH_ads; since adsorption is exothermic, E_app is lower than E_true.

Formulas

r = k·KA·pA/(1 + KA·pA + KR·pR) (A → R, single site, surface reaction controlling)

r = k·KA·KB·pA·pB/(1 + KA·pA + KB·pB + KC·pC)² (LH: A + B → C, both adsorbed)

KA·pA,max = 1 + KB·pB (pA giving maximum LH rate, no product adsorbed)

r = k·KA·pA·pB/(1 + KA·pA) (ER: adsorbed A + gas-phase B)

θA = √(KA·pA)/(1 + √(KA·pA)) (dissociative adsorption)

pA/r = 1/(k·KA) + pA/k (linearised single-site form)

  • r: rate per mass or area of catalyst (mol/kg·s or mol/m²·s); k: surface rate constant (same units as r); Ki: adsorption equilibrium constants (kPa⁻¹); pi: partial pressures (kPa).

E_app = E + ΔH_ads,A (low-coverage single-site case; ΔH_ads < 0)

Worked examples

Example 1 (standard, LH rate and maximum). For A + B → C with LH kinetics: k = 0.1 mol/kg·s, KA = 0.4 kPa⁻¹, KB = 0.2 kPa⁻¹, product not adsorbed. Find the rate at pA = 5 kPa, pB = 4 kPa, and the pA that maximises the rate at this pB.

  1. KA·pA = 2.0; KB·pB = 0.8; denominator = (1 + 2.0 + 0.8)² = 3.8² = 14.44.
  2. Numerator = 0.1 × 2.0 × 0.8 = 0.16.
  3. r = 0.16/14.44 = 0.0111 mol/kg·s.
  4. Maximum: KA·pA = 1 + KB·pB = 1.8 → pA = 4.5 kPa. Then r = 0.1 × 1.8 × 0.8/(3.6)² = 0.144/12.96 = 0.01111 mol/kg·s.

r = 0.0111 mol/kg·s; maximum at pA = 4.5 kPa (so the operating point is almost at the maximum). At pA = 20 kPa the rate falls to 0.0067 mol/kg·s — excess A blocks the sites B needs.

Example 2 (GATE level, fitting a single-site model). For A → R on a catalyst (product weakly adsorbed), initial rates are r = 0.5 mol/kg·s at pA = 10 kPa and r = 1.0 mol/kg·s at pA = 40 kPa. Fit r = k·KA·pA/(1 + KA·pA).

  1. Linear form: pA/r = 1/(k·KA) + pA/k.
  2. Data: pA/r = 10/0.5 = 20 and 40/1.0 = 40 kPa·kg·s/mol.
  3. Slope 1/k = (40 − 20)/(40 − 10) = 0.6667 → k = 1.5 mol/kg·s.
  4. Intercept 1/(k·KA) = 20 − 0.6667 × 10 = 13.33 → KA = 1/(1.5 × 13.33) = 0.05 kPa⁻¹.
  5. Check: r(10) = 1.5 × 0.5/1.5 = 0.5 ✓; r(40) = 1.5 × 2/3 = 1.0 ✓.

k = 1.5 mol/kg·s; KA = 0.05 kPa⁻¹.

Common mistakes

  • Forgetting to square the denominator for a bimolecular surface reaction on two sites (LH), or squaring it for ER.
  • Leaving out product adsorption terms when the product is strongly adsorbed.
  • Assuming the rate always rises with reactant pressure — not for LH kinetics past the maximum.
  • Inconsistent units of K and p (kPa⁻¹ with Pa, or concentration-based K with pressures).
  • Accepting fitted constants that are negative or increase with temperature for adsorption.

For GATE CH

Expect questions that ask you to identify the mechanism from a rate expression, compute the rate or coverage from given constants, find the reactant pressure that maximises an LH rate, deduce limiting orders at high and low pressure, and discriminate models from linear plots. Practise deriving the single-site and dual-site forms from a site balance.

Quick check

  1. In which mechanism does the rate show a maximum with increasing pA?
  2. What is the limiting order in A of r = k·KA·pA/(1 + KA·pA) at high pA?
  3. What term appears for dissociative adsorption of H₂?
  4. Why is the apparent activation energy at low coverage smaller than the true one?

Answers: 1. Langmuir–Hinshelwood; 2. zero; 3. √(KH₂·pH₂); 4. because the exothermic adsorption heat is added to it (E_app = E + ΔH_ads with ΔH_ads < 0).

Try answering each one aloud before you open it.

  1. 1.What is the Langmuir-Hinshelwood mechanism in chemical reaction engineering?Concept

    The Langmuir-Hinshelwood mechanism describes a reaction mechanism where both reactants are adsorbed onto a catalyst surface before reacting. This mechanism assumes that the reaction occurs on the surface of the catalyst and that the adsorption of reactants follows Langmuir adsorption isotherms.

  2. 2.Explain the Eley-Rideal mechanism and how it differs from the Langmuir-Hinshelwood mechanism.Concept

    The Eley-Rideal mechanism involves a reaction between a molecule adsorbed on a catalyst surface and a molecule in the gas phase. Unlike the Langmuir-Hinshelwood mechanism, where both reactants are adsorbed, in the Eley-Rideal mechanism, only one reactant is adsorbed, and the other reacts directly from the gas phase.

  3. 3.Why is the Langmuir-Hinshelwood mechanism commonly used to model heterogeneous catalysis?Application

    The Langmuir-Hinshelwood mechanism is commonly used because it provides a realistic model for reactions where both reactants are adsorbed on the catalyst surface. It accounts for surface coverage and the interaction between adsorbed species, which are critical factors in heterogeneous catalysis.

  4. 4.What are the assumptions made in the Langmuir-Hinshelwood mechanism?Concept

    The catalyst surface is uniform with a fixed number of equivalent sites; adsorption is monolayer and follows the Langmuir isotherm; adsorbed molecules do not interact except by competing for sites. Both reactants are adsorbed and react with each other on the surface. One step — usually the surface reaction — is rate-controlling while the adsorption and desorption steps are at equilibrium, which lets coverages be written in terms of gas-phase partial pressures.

  5. 5.How does temperature affect the Langmuir-Hinshelwood mechanism?Application

    Temperature affects the Langmuir-Hinshelwood mechanism by influencing the adsorption and desorption rates of reactants and products. Higher temperatures generally increase desorption rates, potentially reducing surface coverage and altering reaction rates. The activation energy of the surface reaction also plays a role in determining the temperature dependence.

  6. 6.What happens if the adsorption of one reactant is much stronger than the other in the Langmuir-Hinshelwood mechanism?Application

    If one reactant adsorbs much more strongly than the other, it can lead to surface saturation, blocking sites for the other reactant and potentially reducing the overall reaction rate. This imbalance can shift the reaction kinetics and may require adjustments in catalyst design or operating conditions.

  7. 7.In what scenarios is the Eley-Rideal mechanism more applicable than the Langmuir-Hinshelwood mechanism?Application

    The Eley-Rideal mechanism is more applicable in scenarios where one reactant is present in excess in the gas phase and can directly interact with an adsorbed species. This is often the case in reactions involving highly reactive gas-phase species or when surface coverage is low.

  8. 8.Calculate the Langmuir-Hinshelwood rate for A + B → C (surface reaction controlling, product not adsorbed) with K_A = 0.5 m³/mol, K_B = 0.3 m³/mol, k = 2 mol/m²·s, C_A = 1 mol/m³ and C_B = 2 mol/m³.Numerical

    The dual-site LH rate is r = k·K_A·C_A·K_B·C_B/(1 + K_A·C_A + K_B·C_B)². K_A·C_A = 0.5 and K_B·C_B = 0.6, so the numerator is 2 × 0.5 × 0.6 = 0.6 and the denominator is (1 + 0.5 + 0.6)² = 2.1² = 4.41. Hence r = 0.6/4.41 ≈ 0.136 mol/m²·s. Note that K must have units of inverse concentration so that K·C is dimensionless.

  9. 9.Write the Eley-Rideal rate law for A(adsorbed) + B(gas) → C and state its limiting behaviour.Numerical

    Only A adsorbs, so with Langmuir adsorption θA = KA·pA/(1 + KA·pA) and the rate is r = k·θA·pB = k·KA·pA·pB/(1 + KA·pA). It is always first order in B. In A it is first order at low pA (KA·pA ≪ 1) and zero order at high pA when the surface is saturated. Unlike the Langmuir-Hinshelwood form, the rate never passes through a maximum as pA increases, which is a practical way to tell the two mechanisms apart from data.

  10. 10.Discuss the limitations of the Langmuir-Hinshelwood and Eley-Rideal mechanisms in modeling real catalytic reactions.Application

    Both mechanisms have limitations. The Langmuir-Hinshelwood mechanism assumes uniform surface and neglects complex interactions between adsorbed species, which may not hold true for all catalysts. The Eley-Rideal mechanism assumes direct interaction between gas-phase and adsorbed species, which may not be applicable if surface coverage is high. Both models may require modifications to account for multi-step reactions and non-ideal surfaces.

Finished this topic? Mark it so your progress, study plan and readiness keep up.

Stuck on something here?