Mechanics of orthogonal cutting and Merchant's circle
Orthogonal cutting geometry, chip formation, Merchant's circle force relations, shear-angle theories, velocities and cutting energy, with full worked force analyses.
Drafted with Aria, reviewed by the AiCanCode.org team. Spotted an error? Use Give Feedback at the bottom of the page.
Why it matters
Every turning, milling and drilling calculation – spindle power, tool deflection, fixture clamping force, tool temperature – starts from the cutting force. The orthogonal (2-D) model and Merchant's circle turn two dynamometer readings and a chip-thickness measurement into shear angle, friction coefficient, shear stress and energy, and they explain why positive rake, sharp tools and good lubrication lower power. This is one of the highest-yield numerical topics in manufacturing.
Key ideas
Orthogonal vs oblique cutting. In orthogonal cutting the cutting edge is perpendicular to the cutting velocity and wider than the chip, so the deformation is two-dimensional (plane strain). In oblique cutting the edge is inclined (inclination angle i ≠ 0) and the chip flows sideways. Real turning is oblique, but orthogonal analysis is the standard model; turning a thin-walled tube end-on with a straight edge, or plain-turning with a 90° approach angle, approximates it, with depth of cut playing the role of width b and feed the role of uncut thickness t.
Tool angles that matter here. Rake angle α – between the rake face and the reference plane normal to the cutting velocity (positive rake makes a sharper, weaker wedge). Clearance angle – between the flank and the machined surface; it prevents rubbing.
Chip formation. The work material shears along a narrow shear plane inclined at the shear angle φ to the cutting direction; the chip then slides up the rake face with friction.
- Uncut thickness t becomes chip thickness t_c > t, so the chip thickness ratio r = t/t_c < 1. Its inverse, the chip reduction coefficient, is > 1.
- A large φ means a short shear plane, thin chip, less strain and lower force. Larger rake and lower friction raise φ.
- Chip types: continuous (ductile material, high speed, positive rake – good finish), continuous with built-up edge (ductile material at low speed, adhesion – poor finish), discontinuous (brittle material such as grey cast iron, or low speed with negative rake), serrated/segmented (titanium, hardened steel – localised shear bands).
Forces – the Merchant circle. Measured forces are the cutting force F_c (along the velocity, it sets power) and the thrust force F_t (normal to it, it deflects the tool and work). The resultant R can be resolved two other ways:
- along and normal to the rake face: friction force F and normal force N, with μ = F/N = tan β (β = friction angle);
- along and normal to the shear plane: shear force F_s and normal force F_n. All six components are drawn on a circle with R as the diameter – Merchant's circle diagram.
Shear-angle relations. Merchant minimised cutting energy assuming the shear stress is constant: 2φ + β − α = 90°. Lee and Shaffer (slip-line theory) obtained φ + β − α = 45°. Both show φ rises with rake angle and falls with friction; real values differ, so use whichever relation the question names.
Velocities. Cutting velocity V, chip velocity V_c along the rake face and shear velocity V_s along the shear plane form a closed triangle.
Energy. Power P = F_c·V. Most of it (often well over half) is spent in shearing, the rest in rake-face friction; almost all becomes heat in the chip, tool and work. Specific cutting energy u = F_c/(b·t) is roughly constant for a material and is used to estimate machine power.
Formulas
r = t / t_c = sin φ / cos(φ − α) tan φ = r·cos α / (1 − r·sin α)
r = chip thickness ratio (dimensionless), t = uncut chip thickness (m), t_c = chip thickness (m), φ = shear angle, α = rake angle. By volume constancy r also equals chip length / uncut length = V_c / V.
F = F_c·sin α + F_t·cos α N = F_c·cos α − F_t·sin α μ = tan β = F / N
Rake-face friction and normal forces (N). Signs as written are for positive rake.
F_s = F_c·cos φ − F_t·sin φ F_n = F_c·sin φ + F_t·cos φ
Shear-plane forces (N).
A_s = b·t / sin φ τ_s = F_s / A_s
Shear-plane area (m²) and shear stress (Pa); b = width of cut (m).
F_c = R·cos(β − α) F_t = R·sin(β − α) R = √(F_c² + F_t²)
F_c = τ_s·b·t·cos(β − α) / [sin φ·cos(φ + β − α)]
Cutting force from shear stress and angles.
2φ + β − α = 90° (Merchant) φ + β − α = 45° (Lee–Shaffer)
γ = cot φ + tan(φ − α)
Shear strain (dimensionless).
V_c = V·sin φ / cos(φ − α) = r·V V_s = V·cos α / cos(φ − α)
Chip and shear velocities (m/s).
P = F_c·V u = F_c / (b·t) P = F_s·V_s + F·V_c
Power (W), specific energy (N/mm² = 10⁻³ J/mm³), and the split into shear and friction power.
Worked examples
Example 1 (standard) – full orthogonal analysis. Given: α = +10°, t = 0.2 mm, b = 2.5 mm, t_c = 0.5 mm, V = 2 m/s, F_c = 800 N, F_t = 400 N.
- r = 0.2/0.5 = 0.4;
tan φ = r cos α/(1 − r sin α)= 0.3939/0.9305 ⇒ φ = 22.9°. - F = 800 sin 10° + 400 cos 10° = 138.9 + 393.9 = 532.8 N; N = 800 cos 10° − 400 sin 10° = 787.8 − 69.5 = 718.4 N.
- μ = 532.8/718.4 = 0.742 (β = 36.6°).
- F_s = 800 cos 22.94° − 400 sin 22.94° = 736.6 − 155.9 = 580.8 N; A_s = 2.5 × 0.2/sin 22.94° = 1.283 mm²; τ_s = 453 MPa.
- γ = cot 22.94° + tan 12.94° = 2.364 + 0.230 = 2.59.
- V_c = 0.4 × 2 = 0.8 m/s; V_s = 2 cos 10°/cos 12.94° = 2.02 m/s.
- P = 800 × 2 = 1600 W; check: F_s·V_s + F·V_c = 1173.7 + 426.3 = 1600 W ✓ (73 % in shear). u = 800/0.5 = 1600 N/mm² = 1.6 J/mm³.
Example 2 (GATE level) – predict forces with Merchant's theory. Given: α = 10°, μ = 0.5, τ_s = 400 MPa, b = 2 mm, t = 0.2 mm.
- β = tan⁻¹ 0.5 = 26.57°.
- Merchant: φ = 45° + α/2 − β/2 = 45 + 5 − 13.28 = 36.72°.
- F_c = τ_s·b·t·cos(β − α)/[sin φ·cos(φ + β − α)] = 400 × 0.4 × cos 16.57°/(sin 36.72° × cos 53.28°) = 153.35/(0.5979 × 0.5979) = 429 N.
- F_t = F_c·tan(β − α) = 429 × 0.2975 = 128 N.
- Predicted chip thickness: r = sin 36.72°/cos 26.72° = 0.669 ⇒ t_c = 0.2/0.669 = 0.30 mm.
Common mistakes
- Swapping the sin/cos terms in F and N, or forgetting the sign change for negative rake.
- Using r = t_c/t (that is the chip reduction coefficient, > 1).
- Finding F_s as F_c/cos φ – the thrust force must be included: F_s = F_c cos φ − F_t sin φ.
- Calculator in radians when angles are in degrees.
- Forgetting that in turning the feed is the uncut thickness and the depth of cut is the width (for a 90° approach angle).
- Applying Merchant's relation when the question gives Lee–Shaffer, or vice versa.
- Specific energy units: N/mm² equals MPa, which is 10⁻³ J/mm³, not J/mm³.
For GATE ME
This topic produces several numericals: shear angle from chip thickness, friction coefficient from F_c and F_t, shear stress and shear-plane area, shear strain, chip and shear velocities, power and specific energy, and force prediction from Merchant or Lee–Shaffer. Conceptual items cover chip types and BUE, the effect of rake and friction on φ, and orthogonal vs oblique cutting. Practise the full chain in Example 1 until it takes under five minutes.
Quick check
- If t = 0.25 mm and t_c = 0.5 mm, what is r?
- Write Merchant's shear-angle relation.
- With F_c = 1000 N, F_t = 500 N and α = 0°, what is μ?
- Which force sets the cutting power?
- Which chip type forms when machining grey cast iron?
Answers: 1. 0.5; 2. 2φ + β − α = 90°; 3. μ = F_t/F_c = 0.5; 4. Cutting force F_c; 5. Discontinuous.
Interview questions
All Engineering Materials and Manufacturing Processes interview questionsTry answering each one aloud before you open it.
1.What is orthogonal cutting in the context of machining processes?Concept
Orthogonal cutting is a machining process where the cutting edge of the tool is perpendicular to the direction of tool travel. This type of cutting is characterized by a two-dimensional cutting action, where the cutting edge removes material in a single plane. It is often used to simplify the analysis of cutting forces and tool wear.
2.Explain the significance of Merchant's circle in the analysis of cutting forces.Concept
Merchant's circle is a graphical representation used to analyze the forces involved in orthogonal cutting. It helps in understanding the relationship between the cutting force, thrust force, and resultant force. By using Merchant's circle, engineers can determine the shear angle, friction angle, and other parameters that influence the efficiency and quality of the cutting process.
3.What are the primary forces involved in orthogonal cutting?Concept
The primary forces involved in orthogonal cutting are the cutting force and the thrust force. The cutting force acts in the direction of the tool's motion and is responsible for removing material. The thrust force acts perpendicular to the cutting force and affects the stability of the cutting process. Together, these forces determine the resultant force acting on the tool.
4.Why is the shear angle important in orthogonal cutting, and how does it affect the cutting process?Application
The shear angle is important because it influences the cutting forces, chip formation, and surface finish. A larger shear angle generally results in lower cutting forces and better surface finish, as it reduces the amount of material being sheared at once. The shear angle is determined by the tool geometry and cutting conditions, and optimizing it can lead to more efficient machining.
5.What happens if the friction angle between the chip and the tool rake face increases during orthogonal cutting?Application
The friction angle β is defined by μ = tan β = F/N on the rake face, where the chip slides over the tool. A higher β lowers the shear angle (Merchant: φ = 45° + α/2 − β/2), so the shear plane gets longer, the chip thicker and the shear strain larger. Cutting and thrust forces, power and rake-face temperature all rise, which accelerates crater wear and encourages built-up edge. Cutting fluids, coatings and positive rake are used to counter it.
6.How does tool geometry affect the mechanics of orthogonal cutting?Application
Tool geometry, including rake angle, clearance angle, and cutting edge radius, significantly affects the mechanics of orthogonal cutting. The rake angle influences the shear angle and cutting forces, while the clearance angle affects the contact between the tool and the workpiece. Proper tool geometry can reduce cutting forces, improve chip flow, and enhance surface finish.
7.Calculate the resultant force if the cutting force is 500 N and the thrust force is 300 N in an orthogonal cutting operation.Numerical
To calculate the resultant force (R), use the Pythagorean theorem: R = √(F_c² + F_t²), where F_c is the cutting force and F_t is the thrust force. R = √(500² + 300²) = √(250000 + 90000) = √340000 = 583.1 N.
8.Determine the shear-plane force if the cutting force is 400 N, the thrust force is 200 N and the shear angle is 30°.Numerical
Resolving both measured forces along the shear plane: F_s = F_c·cos φ − F_t·sin φ = 400 × cos 30° − 200 × sin 30° = 346.4 − 100 = 246.4 N. The thrust force cannot be ignored – F_s is not simply F_c/cos φ. The normal force on the shear plane is F_n = F_c·sin φ + F_t·cos φ = 200 + 173.2 = 373.2 N.
9.Explain how chip formation is influenced by the shear angle in orthogonal cutting.Application
The shear angle fixes the chip geometry: chip thickness ratio r = t/t_c = sin φ/cos(φ − α), so a small shear angle gives a thick, heavily strained chip and a long shear plane, while a large shear angle gives a thin chip with lower shear strain γ = cot φ + tan(φ − α) and lower forces. Whether the chip is continuous, discontinuous or segmented depends mainly on the work material's ductility, cutting speed and rake angle; a low shear angle with high strain does, however, push marginal materials towards segmented chips. Raising rake angle and reducing friction both increase φ.
10.What role does the rake angle play in determining the cutting forces in orthogonal cutting?Application
The rake angle is crucial in determining the cutting forces, as it affects the shear angle and the direction of the resultant force. A positive rake angle generally reduces cutting forces by facilitating easier chip flow and reducing the contact area between the tool and the workpiece. However, an excessively large rake angle can weaken the tool edge, leading to premature tool failure.
Finished this topic? Mark it so your progress, study plan and readiness keep up.
Stuck on something here?